Thoughts from the 2013 Texas Relays

Darvis PattonI have always thought two of the most under appreciated sporting events held in Austin are the Texas Relays and the UIL High School Track Meet.   Some might think the idea of watching a meet is incredibly dull and I understand each has their own tastes, but to me the value of the ticket, the location, the scene in the stands, and the level of competition on the track is almost peerless.

Mike Meyer Stadium might not carry the feel that once was there when the Relays and the State Meet were held in Memorial Stadium and you aren’t going to reproduce the feeling of having the size of the crowds that attended when they were held in the Stadium.  Meyer does provide a chance to be close to the action and I have always found the viewing lines to be good. 

Besides, being in Austin during the spring is a great time and the scene in the stands is as good as anywhere.  Some might be a bit odd (such as the guy with the telephone handset strung over his shoulder attached to his cell phone), some might seem a bit out of place (the blonde wearing the designer jeans-Jimmy Choo shoes- designer top that looked great but not exactly the attire for sitting outside for 3-4 hours), but there are things for everyone’s eye in the stands.

In terms of the level of competition I will have to admit that I have always enjoyed watching track and field because it has a simplicity and purity to the competition between the athletes. It doesn’t get more basic yet pure than I can outrun you, jump you, throw (put) you.  Yes, there still are outside variables that creep in from time to time, but it really is to me the cleanest form of athletic competition. 

For those who don’t follow track the level of competition in the state of Texas is among the very best in the country across the events.  When I sit down and think about all the great athletes and performances I have seen over the years I truly don’t think it is an idle boast to say over the years the Relays have been on par with any outdoor meet in the country.  The best part is that it isn’t just athletes from Texas, but high schools from across the country.  This year off the top of my head there were athletes from Illinois and Florida that competed and did so at an elite level.

When I think about the some of the athletes I have watched over the years it has been some of the greats from Texas’ high school ranks and this year we were treated to a men’s open 100 meters race that included former Olympians, had I believe four runners break 10 flat, and featured a winning time of 9.75.  Granted the wind was over the legal limits for the times being deemed “legitimate”, but this wasn’t a thirty mile an hour tailwind and for all the meets I have been out I had never seen anyone break ten flat let alone four in one race. 

The race was also a great barometer for just how incredible Usain Bolt’s record of 9.58 is when you think that even with the aid of the wind Doc Patton still did not get within a tenth of a second of bolt which is a big margin in that race. 

Once again Pat Henry showed how he has built the Texas A&M track program into a power with a group of men’s sprinters that were far and away the fastest group at the meet.  The Ags’ men were the dominant relay teams winning the University 4 x 100 and 4 x 200 and taking second in the 4 x 400.  Henry’s men team are currently ranked #2 in the USTFA Division 1 rankings and his women’s team are ranked #1.

The I-20 Corridor of Dallas again flexed its muscle on the high school levels as Lancaster, and De Soto were among the dominant high school teams attending the meet.  When you include the performance of the Cedar Hill teams I am not sure there is another area in the country that consistently produces the numbers of elite sprinters, relay teams, and middle distance athletes.

Top individual high school performer however was an athlete from the Houston area with Cameron Burrell showing one he is among the nation’s elite sprinters.  Burrell dominated a strong field in the high school hundred posting the nation’s fastest time and was outstanding on his relay legs. He wasn’t however the most impressive high school athlete at the meet.  That was Beaumont Ozen’s Tony Brown.  Brown is considered one of the top defensive back prospects in the country this upcoming year and the junior proved he is just as dominant on the track.  Tony dominated a strong field in the 110 HH by running at that time the nation’s fastest time and less than 30 minutes later taking fourth in the same 100M race won by Burrell.  Brown broke 10.5 in that race and has a physique that can easily carry more weight as he gets older and spends more time in the weight room.

Two other athletes that caught my eye from the perspective of raw ability and frame were two 2014 football prospects.  Arlington Martin junior Myles Garrett performed in the shot put and while his future isn’t in that size he showed the frame and raw ability that has him considered among the nation’s top defensive end prospects. The other was Dallas Lincoln and TCU commit Emanuel Porter. Porter ran on Lincoln’s relays and while not an elite sprinter he more than held his own showing very good speed for a bigger athlete and a raw frame that hasn’t even begun to fill out.  This is a kid who is involved in multiple sports and doesn’t have the resources of some of the other higher regarded prospects in the 2014 class, but the upside on this kid is huge and I would not be surprised if we he more about him next fall. 

I have attached some links of results from the meets, video footage, and photos for those who are interested.  If you have ever attended I highly recommend it and don’t forget that the state meet will be held in Austin in a few weeks. 

http://www.flotrack.org/coverage/250626-2013-Texas-Relays/article/19709-RESULTS-2013-Texas-Relays

http://www.runnerspace.com/news.php?news_id=111806

http://www.runnerspace.com/photos.php?photo_id=327951

http://www.ustfccca.org/rankings/division-i-rankings#otfd1ranks

2013 Paper Frogs

FrogMy title isn’t intended to poke fun at any of the young men who have decided to attend TCU and play for the Frogs nor the idea those who follow college football recruiting. Simply, it is a poor play of words on one of Coach Patterson’s favorite terms when he is asked to talk about his recruiting classes. 

 

Despite the continued growth in websites, recruiting services, blogs, and the explosion of social media it seems that each year we see players who emerge on the college level that were somewhat unnoticed by all the experts except for the staff (or staffs) that sought them.   Each year attempts are made to evaluate which classes are the “best” as if each of these players is merely pieces in a puzzle of ingredients to be handed over to great chef. 

 

I do agree that each and every year there are a group of young men who would for the most part have success wherever they would choose to attend and whatever offensive or defensive system they were recruited to fit.  Not exactly the most profound thought on my part as I can recall Jim Wacker years ago stating in his first press conference at TCU saying simply that they wanted to recruit players who were big, fast, strong, and smart, but the problem was so did everyone else in the county.

 

The world of college football has changed since then, but that basic concept holds true.  Each year there are that special group of players who everyone would want and success does depend upon to a degree the ability to land those players, but what truly separates programs in terms of recruiting to me is how you find that next group of players. Those who fit into your system perfectly, those who have those distinct skills and abilities you value, and those young men who have the other traits that allow them to buy completely into your program.  In my mind it is those abilities that truly distinguish good recruiting staffs from great staffs and is among the areas that don’t get factored very well by the services in their rankings and even their work.

 

A good example is Derrick Kindred.  Kindred at SA Wagner played running back, safety, and linebacker.  He wasn’t highly regarded, heck I am not sure if most services, bloggers, and TCU followers even knew who the guy was until Ed Pope switched to A&M and TCU beat out ISU and UH for his signature.  Fast forward 8-9 months later and we find this lightly regarded recruit is not only starting at WVU, but he turns in a big performance with 10 tackles (9 solo) and 2 pass break-ups.  Do I know if the staff knew when they signed him that Derrick would be able to deliver that type of performance in that environment with everything going on in the program as quickly as Derrick did that day in Morgantown?  No.  What I do believe is they saw specific physical abilities and other traits that indicated to them that Derrick could be successful in the TCU 4-2-5 and that is one of the big keys for this staff building the program to a competitive level in the Big 12.

 

How then, do I believe should classes be evaluated if all recruits don’t fit the same way in a distinct scheme?  First, does the class address any specific short –term needs?  The best example is that when Stansly Maponga made the decision to leave TCU for the 2013 NFL draft the idea of landing at least one defensive end prospect went from building depth in the program to an immediate need.  Perfect situation is that you can address a short-term need with a prospect (or prospects) that also build for the long-term,  but I also think that filling a short-term need (i.e. signing Mike Tuaua) can be done so effectively and not address the long-term.  Second is do the players you sign have the overall general abilities to develop into your system long-term with the added potential benefit of being able to contribute early (i.e. Kindred). 

 

Don’t get me wrong, I would love for TCU each and every year to sign a recruiting class that is far and away better than every other class in the conference, but that is an accurate picture of the competitive world of college football. That doesn’t mean however that TCU can’t bring in great talent and I will always put more faith in a staff that is out turning over rocks late in the high school season and find a potential shut down corner in Cydney Calvin who switched to defense the middle of his senior year than multiple websites and bloggers who overemphasize summer camp drills and film clips.

 

Starting with the offense I think it was fairly easy to identify the short term needs of the program (better quarterback play, improved offensive line play, and re-stock the running back position).  It is important to note that not all short term needs are met through recruiting.  TCU got the best possible realistic option when it was announced that Casey had completed his re-hab and would be coming back to the program.  Furthermore the situation in the offensive line could be addressed with the return of James Dunbar, Bobby Thompson, and Michael Thompson and Aaron Green is a great prospect at running back.  Finally when you add in transfer receivers  Ju’ Juan Storey and Josh Doctson,  Deante’ Gray’s move back to wide receiver,  and Stephen Bryant returning from the knee to those six players the TCU offense projects to be significantly better than it was last year. 

 

That was a great start, but TCU still needed to address short term needs in the offensive line and at least one running back.  Long term they need to bring in another quarterback prospect, more athletic depth along the offensive line, depth at running back, and younger players to start grooming at wide receiver (Time flies people and don’t forget that Carter, White, and Porter all will be juniors next season.).

 

Considering the short and long term needs I think TCU did a great job at their skill positions and I think people will be surprised in the offensive line sooner than expected by many.  Here are profiles of the players TCU projects to the offensive side of the ball in their 2013 class:

 

ZAC ALLEN (6’3” 185 lb.) – quarterback prospect from Temple, Texas. Allen was a late pledge to TCU switching from Syracuse literally days before TCU students returned for the spring semester. This might be part of the reason he got lost from the attention as it seemed one day he was committing and the next enrolling in school. 

 

Don’t view him as a prospect signed to fill a roster spot as he has a great deal of upside.  TCU has trended towards mobile quarterbacks and while some regard him as a drop back passer he has run under 4.6 in the forty and over 1,800 yards during his high school career.  His career passing numbers are over 4,500 yards with 39 scoring tosses and Allen showed enough in Dallas last summer to earn an invite to the Elite 11 Camp. 

He needs to get physically strong (Hudl shows his him with a 225 bp/ 340 sq/ 245 pc) as he has a wiry build, but remember that  just two years ago he was playing quarterback as a sophomore at around 155.   There are the same questions you will see about any high school spread quarterback.  Can he make reads, arm strength etc. but I do think Allen is a good quarterback prospect with an accurate arm and plus mobility.

 

blog.syracuse.com/orangefootball/2012/06/espns_trent_dilfer_on_syracuse.html

 

espn.go.com/video/clip?id=8083031&categoryid=8016764

 

http://www.nunesmagician.com/2012/9/10/3308413/zach-allen-scouting-report

 

http://www.burntorangenation.com/2012/3/29/2909830/2013-recruiting-a-look-at-the-rivals-positional-rankings-offense

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/1145718/highlights/35410373

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zakRGo9cQA8

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYPFJhUE4S8

 

 

TREVORRIS JOHNSON (6’ 210 lb.) – running back prospect from Alief Taylor High School in Houston.  Last year many people were surprised by the play of true freshman running back B.J. Catalon.    Maybe it was because Catalon played at an HISD school, maybe it was because prior to his senior year BJ didn’t post big numbers like other high school backs, and maybe he did make the combine circuit so many recruiting services use to verify the value of a prospect.  If you looked at his numbers and watched the video you could see he was a legit prospect.  Meet this year’s version of the prospect that posted big numbers, faced good competition, and for some reason really hasn’t gotten the attention.

 

Trevorris is a physical back with a down hill running style that projects to fill a need in the TCU backfield for a bigger running back.  If you watch the video you can see that once he makes a decision he hits hard utilizing a strong lower body and above average body shift.  Hudl shows his bench at 305 and a 405 sq to compliment a sub 4.5 forty time.  Johnson is not the home run threat that Catalon was at Westside and isn’t comparable to Aaron Green or a healthy Waymon James. He projects to be a physical running prospect to compliment those smaller backs and he looks to have a frame that can carry 220-230 lbs as he matures, but long runs against Aldine Eisenhower and Houston Lamar show he has plus quickness in the open field. 

 

So why no more attention?  Consider that prior to his senior year he had ~700 career rushing yards and 7 scores. His senior year he posted over 2,100 yards/ 19 touchdowns/ 7.8 ypc for a team that he was basically the offense.  The rest of Alief Taylor’s offensive skill players TOTALED less than 1,500 yards combined and 16 touchdowns. Bottom line is that opponents went into games knowing if they stopped Trevorris they stood a good chance to beat Taylor and they faced some very good defenses last year.   

 

I have heard and read some comments about his struggles in the Katy, Eisenhower, and Hightower games.  Johnson was held down in each of those games aside from a long run against Ike.  If you look at each video you will see that there just wasn’t much running room and some great runs for no game.  Additionally, each of those games was unique and in the case of Katy more than a few very good backs struggled against them. Patrick Carr was on a much more talented The Woodlands offense and struggled, same for Jamaal James of Cinco Ranch, and Keith Ford only hit Katy for a 77 yard scoring run (he did little else when the game mattered) when the Tigers were up 56-0 in the third quarter. 

 

The biggest selling point to me on Johnson though is the 176 he posted against Lamar on 28 carries.  Lamar’s defense was playing as well as any group in the state by the end of the year and basically carried that team into the 5A finals against Allen.  Watch the video of that game and you will see Johnson didn’t back down against a defense that came after him the entire game.

 

Bottom line is that in my mind Trevorris Johnson might end up being the biggest immediate impact player on the TCU offense in 2013.

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/456742/#highlights/36732373

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOjpGx32YJo

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_Yli_tlWu0

 

http://oregon.247sports.com/Board/45/Trevorris-Johnson-film-16216034/1#a16216966

 

KYLE HICKS (5’ 10” 190 lb.) –running back prospect from Arlington Martin.  Hicks is the highest rated of the Frogs recruits in 2013 and was a UT pledge who switched to the Frogs late citing a desire to play close to home and connection with former high school teammate Devonte Fields. A friend who is a UT alum joking says that Hicks is the player to be named later in the Daje’ Johnson trade.   I don’t believe that Hicks’ decision to switch is a sign that recruits view the UT and TCU programs on the same plane, but I do believe it was and is a positive sign for other prospects in the Metroplex especially that a highly regarded prospect with standing offers with other large programs opted to stay at home. 

 

When you watch video on Hicks you see a back with plus quickness, vision, and balance.  He is a very patient running who anticipates and sets up blocks very well. It is very easy to see why Gary Patterson in his press conference on signing day used the cliché of “thunder and lighting” when describing the differing styles of Kyle and Trevorris. 

 

A three-year letterman for a very good Martin program Hicks was used in a variety of roles on offense (primarily a back he was also used as their quarterback in the wildcat formation, in the passing game, and also has returned kicks) his last two years he totaled over 3,900 yards in total offense and 57 touchdowns.    Noted performances include 113 yards rushing as a junior in Martin’s play-off victory over favored Trinity,  over 100 total yards against DeSoto (including a great touch down run you can find on Hudl), and 200+ yards against Skyline and Arlington High.

 

The biggest question about Hicks has nothing to do with his ability as he definitely has plus ability in almost every area as a back except for physical size.  Unfortunately his sophomore year and senior year were shortened by injury (foot as a sophomore and a knee as a senior) and that does raise the durability question.  I would anticipate with TCU projecting Green, Catalon, and Johnson for next fall and quite possibly a well James that Hicks would be able to sit the year to ensure his recovery.  Once well I think TCU has shown that they do a good job of spreading the load among their backs and I do think that in a year the combination of Green, Catalon, Johnson, and Hicks will provide a very formidable backfield for opposing defenses.

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/476886/#highlights/21690375

 

http://www.shaggybevo.com/board/showthread.php/106606-5-Kyle-Hicks

 

http://www.nationalunderclassmen.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=23100&ATCLID=205832564

 

http://campussportsconnection.com/ncaa/texas-longhorns/story/197017

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3q34bDzQSY

 

 

TY SLANINA (6’ 182 lb.) – wide receiver prospect from East Bernard High School.  The easy thing of Ty is to focus on his speed.  He has been clocked under 4.4 at multiple college camps, run 23.20 in the 200M as a sophomore, 15.96 in the 110H, and 42.08 in the 300H.  Some track athletes don’t always translate their speed on the track to success on the football field (i.e. Refugio’s Toya Jones for example), but in Ty’s case the explosive quickness combined with plus vision and agility helped him produce some big numbers in East Bernard’s option offense. Over three years he ran for over 3,100 yards, averaged 11.0 ypc, ran for 55 touchdowns, and ran for a touchdown every 5th carry.   Among Ty’s 64 career scoring plays in three years at East Bernard 18 were over fifty yards, 7 were over seventy yards, and AVERAGED over 35.0 yards per scoring play. 

 

This is a guy whose career was a continual string of big plays and it is very easy to see him being a big-play guy for TCU playing the inside receiver position.  If you watch the highlights on Hudl you can see the great acceleration in a run against Altair Rice where Ty outruns two defenders who have the angle on him.  I reference this specific play because the biggest knock on him is the level of competition he faced at 2A.  Watch the play and note how far ahead they are of Ty when he breaks clear of the line and Ty shows the plus acceleration needed to score untouched by either defender.

 

Best part of this kid though isn’t the great speed, balance, or instincts.  Ty is a tremendous competitor from a line of competitors.  His maternal grandfather is a Texas high school football coaching legend, uncle was a great high school athlete, mother was an even better high school and college athlete, and father played college football.  This is a kid who has been taught to not only play the game the right way, but to win.  He has won multiple medals at the state track meet and was part of a state championship football team this year at East Bernard. You want every recruit to pan out on the field, but the very best of the recruits are those who have a positive impact on your program off it as well. Ty is that type of recruit.

 

The biggest knocks on Ty are his frame, level of competition, and the position change.  Remember that Ty is a three sport athlete in high school (football, track & field, and baseball) so he has never gone through a truly focused off-season program. He plans to try playing football and baseball at TCU which Patterson and his staff have experience with sharing the athlete. He will never be a big receiver, but I do think he will get stronger and be able to handle the physical demands of the position. 

 

In regards to the conversion to wide receiver this is another area the staff has had very good success with during their time in Fort Worth.  The two most recent examples and quite possibly the best are Jeremy Kerley and Brandon Carter. Ty and fellow 2013 recruit/ receiver prospect Cameron Echols-Luper show many of the same traits as those players and I will not be surprised if one of them makes an impact in 2013 even with the Frogs depth at receiver.

 

http://www.texas4asports.com/index.cgi?board=collegesports&action=display&thread=466

 

http://www.maxpreps.com/blogs/blog.aspx?athleteid=5be66e7d-de1d-4c01-b9be-a06c47f0eed4&ssid=37631434-bc40-4d46-a7c5-1042c42e338c

 

http://www.exbobcatblab.com/east-bernard-analysis.html

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDa497np-Qw

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrJb4cxvhrs

 

http://texas.247sports.com/Board/21/East-Bernard-vs-1-Refugio-14787659/1#a14788725

 

http://gofrogs.cstv.com/allaccess/?media=367204

 

 

CAMERON ECHOLS-LUPER (6’ 190 lb.) wide receiver prospect from Auburn High School in Auburn, Alabama. In many ways CEL is a mirror image of Ty Slanina.  CEL has that same explosive speed being time consistently under 4.4 in the 40 along with electronic times of 10.65 in the 100M, 21.24 in the 200M, and long jumped just under 24’. 

 

He played predominantly quarterback in high school he amassed over 4,300 total yards and 51 touchdowns playing in Alabama largest classification.  Watching the video of CEL you can see the plus quickness combine with great agility, vision, and balance. Much like Slanina, the people I talked to about CEL raved as much or more about the strength of his character traits and leadership as they did his speed and explosiveness with the ball.  One difference between the two is CEL does appear to have a bit bigger and stronger frame. Hudl shows best of 285 in the bench press and best squat of 380. 

 

TCU has recruited multiple players from outside the state of Texas during Patterson’s tenure and I think these kids get oft overlooked and underrated.  CEL was an Ag commit who opted to look elsewhere and was contacted by multiple other Big 12 schools before deciding on TCU.  The biggest questions on him like Ty are not the physical ability as the move over to the receiver position. 

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/154355/#highlights/375434

 

http://tamu.247sports.com/Article/Auburn-High-head-talks-about-Cameron-Echols-Luper-86528

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTFa5doWOTA

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8Hs9Wyl5j8

 

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2012/11/jason_smith_cameron_echols-lup.html

 

 

JERMAINE ANTOINE (5’11” 190 lb.) – wide receiver prospect from Loreauville High School in Loreauville, Louisiana.  Some recruits arrive with resumes that contain eye popping stats and/or physically impressive numbers and others on paper just don’t see to be as impressive.

 

I don’t think it is an insult to Jermaine to say that on paper he doesn’t look as impressive as his 2013 recruit/receiver prospect peers Ty Slanina and Cameron Echols-Luper.  It is also important for me to point out that earlier in this article I referenced the recruit of Derrick Kindred last year and if you compared Derrick on paper to fellow 2012 recruit/ safety prospect Jordan Moore the difference between the two on two would be just as vast.  Point being that some guys are just ball players plain and simple. It doesn’t mean that they don’t have physical tools because the only way Kindred could come up with 10 open field tackles against the WVU last year was if he could run just a bit as well as a few other things.

 

I can’t find a forty time for Antoine anywhere, no confirmed track times, and the numbers for his senior year in high school are a somewhat pedestrian 1,200+ total yards and 17 touchdowns.  Watch the video of him however and you see a kid who continually makes plays on both sides of the ball.  Offensively Jermaine shows great balance, plus acceleration, very good vision and anticipation, and a very strong lower body.  Defensively we see good anticipation and a willingness to contact. 

 

As pointed out with CEL, I think many don’t know much about Jermaine because they don’t know high school football in Louisiana and questions about academics kept his offers down.  I know some are bothered by his only true offer at the end being from North Texas, but if you watch the video and look at the staff’s track record I think this is a guy with potential.  He starts at receiver, but I would not be surprised if there is move to the backfield or the defensive side of the ball.

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/151178/#highlights/31220756

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuvZiUpucU4

 

http://thefootballoffice.com/teamvideos/148/41/athlete-7-jermaine-antoine/tab/317435

 

 

CHARLIE REID (6’5” 225 lb.) – tight end prospect from All Saints Episcopal School in Ft. Worth Texas.  On paper Charlie looks to be everything TCU has been looking for in a tight end.  He shows great speed posting not only a sub 4.6 forty, but an 11.4 100M, a 23.7 200M and a 55.7 400M. to compliment (according to Hudl) a 335 best on the bench press and a 475 squat. 

 

His numbers in high school indicate production shouldn’t be a concern as he caught 119 balls during his high school career, totaled 2,431 yards, averaged over 20 yards a catch in his career, and had 27 scoring catches.  Charlie’s senior numbers alone (50 catches – 1,229 yards – 24.6 yards per catch – 17 scoring catches) dwarf the career numbers of fellow 2013 signee and tight end prospect Bryson Burnett.

 

The biggest questions surrounding Reid are first the level of competition he faced in high school playing in the Southwest Preparatory Conference and one of the two teams they played last year that wasn’t a private/prep school was Carter Riverside which is a historically bad FWISD program, but Brownwood is a very solid program and they beat them handily.  I think one big thing to remember is it really doesn’t matter if Gordon Wood or Bob Shipley were on that Brownwood sideline. Instead, that the level of competition faced by All Saints was not that much different than many of the kids playing 3A ball and lower around the state and that he played at a very high level. There will be an adjustment period, but will it take any long than Slanina, Burnett, Denzell Johnson, or even Trevorris Johnson who play at the 5A level.

 

The second question and the bigger one to me is that in many of Reid’s highlights you see him split out into a slot.  We don’t really know what the future of the TCU will be with Fuentes leaving for Memphis last season, the loss of Casey, the porous offensive line, and the erratic play of Boykin. There has been talk about the desire to utilize the tight end position in a manner similar to the Patriots which involves multiple TE’s, multiple alignments, and Reid’s physical abilities would seem ideal for him lining up in the back-field as an H-back, as a wing, in the slot, and a traditional alignment.  In some of those situations he will have to contend with having a defensive player lined up over him and his ability to release from the line and get into the route while facing a defender who is better athletically in all phases than what he saw in high school is an unknown.  I truly believe this is the biggest challenge a new prospect faces when making the jump from high school to college regardless of the high classification.  Off the top of my head I truly don’t recall that many linebackers, defensive ends, or safeties that are comparable to what the offensive player will face in college on a weekly basis and the ability to make that adjustment is critical.

 

Tight end is a position that TCU has not gotten much production in recent years, big things were expected of Stephen Bryant who was lost to a knee and now much show he is ready to contribute, and the leading receiver in terms of career catches at the position is Griffin Gilbert with 2 catches for 11 yards.  That means there is a great chance for Reid to see the time early if he can make the jump to the college level.  The physical ability is there, but that isn’t the hard part of the equation. 

 

http://www.burntorangenation.com/2012/3/29/2909830/2013-recruiting-a-look-at-the-rivals-positional-rankings-offense

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywXBykHRcCI

 

http://texas.247sports.com/Board/21/Junior-Video-TE-Charlie-Reid-5117570/1#a5119422

 

 

BRYSON BURNETT (6’ 5” – 225 lb.) –tight end prospect from Springtown High School in Springtown, Texas.  Unlike his tight end contemporary Reid; Burnett doesn’t bring big production numbers from high school.  In fact, I am not sure if Bryson had 25 career catches at tight end and a good number of the video you can find on him is playing on the defensive side of the ball for the Porcupines. 

 

Remember though that of any position on the offensive side of the ball that seems to be hard to project based upon high school numbers it is tight end.  Burnett is a great athlete with a long frame that looks thinner than his peer Reid though they both are listed at similar weights.  Playing for a 3A high school he played both sides of the ball which is something he most likely wouldn’t have done had he played for a larger school and in his video footage you see very good quickness and flexibility for his size. 

 

That shouldn’t come as a surprise as Bryson not only has run in 4.6’s in the forty, Hudl shows a 4.12 shuttle, and he has posted track times of 15.44 in the 110HH’s along with 40.2 in the 300 IMH’s.  The hurdle times are interesting because those are faster than wide receiver recruit Ty Slanina has posted at the same distances. 

 

A multi-sport athlete at Springtown you can tell he has great lower body strength and explosion through his hips as Hudl shows a squat of 515, a power clean of 330 (impressive when you consider that is almost 150% of his body weight), and a 32” vertical leap.  Combine the physical ability with great intelligence on and off the field I truly believe Burnett is one of those players who TCU has had great success in the past with finding, give time to physically develop, and make an impact compared to higher rated peers.

 

Bryson did graduate early and is going through spring practice.  It will be very interesting to see how he physically matures in the next few months and how fast he adjusts to college level competition.  Unlike Reid, Burnett normally lined up as a traditional tight end, but we don’t know how effective he can be in the passing game. You can find some footage on him from 7-on-7, but there is a big difference in flag-football (I realize how physical it can get, but it isn’t the same.) and full pads.  As stated above, TCU really doesn’t have a great number of known’s at the tight end position with Bryant returning from knee surgery, Gilbert still being more of a big receiver and h-black that a traditional tight end, and  Ballard-Merka-Murphy have not really shown yet they are up to the needs of the position. 

 

Burnett will get a chance, but also don’t be surprised if you see him flip over to the defensive side of the ball. I have heard him compared to the Schobels in terms of physical ability and playing style. 

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/467288/#highlights/29202416

 

EASON FROMAYAN (6’5” 285 lb) – offensive tackle prospect from  Milton High School in Alpharetta, Georgia might be the least known of the four offensive line prospects signed by TCU in 2013, but don’t be surprised if he ends up in the rotation at offensive tackle.  TCU has recruited a large number of kids from outside the state of Texas while Patterson has been head coach and I do believe this is one reason why their talent is oft under rated by people inside the state of Texas.  Texas is such a big state that I have never bought into anyone being able to accurately gauge all the talent in a given class let alone be able to accurately compare that talent with players from outside the state. 

 

He was All-State at the largest classification in Georgia last year and was a Cincinnati commit that flipped to TCU. His father was a 4-year letterman in basketball at TCU and you can see Eason has plus agility and footwork in his video. In terms of physical measurables Hudl shows a 5.12 forty, 29” vertical, 365 bench, and a 470 pound squat. 

 

Watching his footage Eason combines a long frame with good footwork and the ability to get to the second level on running plays. He needs to get more consistent in his initial punch off the line and is a little stiff, but you don’t find many high school offensive linemen who are truly polished in all areas because they rarely get challenged by the time of player they will see in college.  Fromayan did face good competition in high school and with his being able to go through spring in 2013 and build on his physical conditioning I would not be shocked if he ended up being the fourth offensive tackle for TCU in their rotation in 2013.

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/363284/#highlights/14762381

 

http://www.downthedrive.com/2012/6/8/3072079/mammoth-offensive-lineman-eason-fromayan-pledges-bearcats

 

http://www.nationalunderclassmen.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=23100&ATCLID=205756889

 

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/recruiting/football/story/_/id/8553917/milton-ga-high-school-takes-marietta-ga-walton-part-espn-high-school-football-showcase

 

PATRICK MORRIS (6’ 3” 290 lb.) – offensive line prospect from Guyer High School in Denton, Texas.  Morris played for one of the most successful programs in the state of Texas and faced some of the best competition in the Metroplex area in early season and the state going into the play-offs.

 

He primarily played offensive tackle for the Wildcats, but projects to slide inside which fits his body build and strengths as a player.  Key word here is strength as Morris has posted numbers of 350 in the bench, 560 in the squat, and a 385 power clean.  Those last two numbers reflect the great lower body strength Morris has and you can see it watching him on video.  He is very physical at the point of attack with a wide, compact build and good feet he keeps up under himself when run blocking.

 

Biggest weakness looks to be lateral agility, but if he slides down inside that should be minimized and there is talk that the Frogs might look at him as a possible center prospect.  TCU is thin at proven talent at the guard and center position and Morris will be given every chance to show he can contribute as part of their interior line.  The biggest challenge though is proving he can handle college level interior defensive linemen.  These are guys who are going to be larger, stronger, and in some cases quicker than what he faced in high school.   Morris is a player who has been able to physically dominate most of the defensive linemen he has faced in his career, but that will change the moment he steps onto the TCU campus.  If he can hold his own in fall camp against the Frog d-tackles he will be able to contribute, but that isn’t a given.  Joey Hunt found out last year just how big that jump can be when he struggled being able to hold up at the point of attack against KU and ISU early in the conference schedule.  Perfect world would be Morris follows the same model TCU has used in the past for their offensive line which would be a red-shirt year and then Morris work his way into the starting line-up, but unless someone steps up inside I wouldn’t be shocked to see Morris garner playing time early to see if he will be ready to help come conference play. 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJtSCHLVJoA

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLI-V3Pf1Tg

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdjwUenzw-M

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAMmnbJlmD0

 

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=7940117

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/190319/highlights/25455384

 

 

JOSEPH NOTEBOOM (6’5” 260 lb.) – offensive line prospect from Plano High School appears to be the most athletic of the four offensive linemen signed in 2013, but projects to be the least likely to help in 2013 based upon his weighing only 260.  It is possible he could gain weight before August, but after seeing him at the OU last fall he looked more like a TE or DE than a OT (especially in the legs). 

 

That doesn’t mean there isn’t a great deal to like with Noteboom and it begins with plus feet and quickness for an offensive line prospect with a long frame.  If you watch his video you can see how he is able to quickly turn his body to shield defenders and get to the second level on running plays.  No surprise based upon the 4.8 forty he is reported to have run, but he will need to gain some weight and get stronger (reported 315 bench and 400 squat. In comparison 160 lb. cornerback prospect Ranthony Texada has a posted squat of 370).

 

TCU needs to have athletic tackles to handle the pass rushers they will face in the Big 12 and I think that Noteboom has the upside to be a very athletic offensive tackle.  The reality is there are very few high school kids who have all the traits you want in terms of size, strength, agility, balance, and feet. It is very difficult to take a big player who doesn’t have the last three and compensate on the edge which is why I would rather the Frogs opt for someone like Noteboom who has those last three, a frame to gain weight, and the work ethic to get stronger than the other.  Big key here will be time and patience. 

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/586805/highlights

 

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=7940173

 

http://rivals.yahoo.com/video/game-highlights-football/Rice/Rivals-Spotlight-Joseph-Noteboom-1107068

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/video/highschool-26866214/tcu-commit-joseph-noteboom-talks-about-his-pick-30292486.html

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEX1llyL1eU

 

 

 

LLOYD TUNSTILL (6’4” 330 lb.) – offensive line prospect from College of the Canyons in Santa Clarita, California.  Patterson and his staff have not been afraid to action if they felt there was a hole in their team that needed to be filled quickly.  Perfect examples are signing Jason Verrett two years ago out of Santa Rosa JC to address a hole at cornerback on the 2012 team and last year signing PJ Dawson out of Trinity Valley JC after the Frog linebacker position got wiped out due to injuries and stupidity.    Yes, Dawson did not come close to make the same impact as Verrett, heck it can be argued that Dawson barely made an impact at all on the 2012 team.  I liked the move because they did something about a need on the roster and they acted instead of trying to force the same solution. 

 

Patterson has commented that TCU must get stronger in their interior offensive line and when you look at the Frog roster what we see inside for them is one known in Tausch, hope that Michael Thompson is healthy and has lost weight, a senior who has yet to continually contribute in Woolridge, and four younger players in Childs, Foltz, Hunt, and Naff who will be given every chance to show they deserve time in the spring and the fall camps.  All of that means if you are truly honest that TCU has one player they know what they can expect and several if’s which isn’t always bad, but you need to have a contingency plan and it is even better if that plan is good enough to push for starter’s minutes and force those if’s to step up if they want time next fall.

 

Tunstill is exactly that contingency plan. He is a very physical player with good size and strength who should be able to push for a starting position inside for the Frogs.  As with Morris you will find Tunstill playing tackle in most of the video available on him.  What you will see is a guy who isn’t the most agile, gets beat at times by quicker players, and needs to deliver more than an initial punch at times.  You will also see a big, physical frame combined with a nasty streak in a player. Unfortunately, Lloyd wasn’t an early enrollee and gone through spring practice. He could use the time to refine technique and he does need to lose some weight to improve his agility and quickness. 

With his being a JUCO with two years to play two Tunstill needs to come to Ft. Worth in shape so that he can contribute early and often next year.  It would be great if his presence motivated some of the younger players to up their level of play, but it would be a big disappointment if Lloyd isn’t at least part of the Frogs interior line rotation.

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/80868/highlights/17011374

 

 

Defensively TCU came into the 2012 with a number of questions and many people skeptical that the Frogs could have the same type of success in the offensive minded Big 12 as they had under Patterson in CUSA and then MWC.  Despite having an offensive that struggled all season with trouble in its offensive line, the loss of Casey Pachall one game into conference play, an inexperienced quarterback in Boykin, the loss of Ed Wesley prior to the season, Wayman James early in the year, and Tucker hurt much of the year TCU put together a very impressive first season in its new conference. 

 

The Frogs finished among the top three schools in 8 of the 10 team defensive categories for the total season 6 of the 10 for conference play.  The only category they finished in the bottom half was red zone defense for both season and conference play. What makes these results even more impressive besides the problems on the offensive side of the ball is that TCU had no real depth at cornerback (a critical position in the Frogs defense), played an undersized walk on much of the season at linebacker, and played two upperclassmen in their defensive line. Among those players in the TCU defensive front were three true freshmen (Fields, Lathan, and McFarland), red-shirt freshman Davion Pearson, and three sophomores (Hunter, Johnson, and Lewis). 

 

Coming out of 2012 the only real short-term needs the Frogs appeared to have was depth at cornerback (something that could be addressed by transfer David Jenkins who Patterson and Jennings are very high on and hopefully a contribution from a healthy Travoskey Garrett)  and help at linebacker in terms of replacing senior Kenny Cain and depth at the position.  That changed a bit however when junior Stansley Maponga opted to enter the NFL draft opening up a need a defensive end. Regardless of the reason(s) why Maponga left or if it was a smart move the only reality that matters for this team in 2013 is that they have a big hole to fill opposite DeVonte’ Fields. 

 

The Frogs added quality depth at cornerback, but it remains to be seen if they did find immediate help at linebacker and defensive end.  Long term I like the prospects TCU signed at linebacker, but there are legitimate questions if the three are physically ready to play in the Big 12 at linebacker.  The Frogs got caught by surprise on Maponga and I think Patterson and his staff lost critical time they could have used to address the need had they had some forewarning. They did sign a JUCO defensive end that looks like he will be able to provide at least quality depth, but I am not sure is the ultimate answer at this position for the Frogs. That could come from either McFarland or Anderson, but I am also intrigued by the potential of Bryson Henderson.  He shows great quickness off the ball, plus flexibility and agility for a big man, and shows a knack for slipping blockers.  Henderson doesn’t project long term as a defensive end, but I do think he might be a short term solution at the position and an overlooked gem in the defensive line.

 

Biggest question for him actually is the test score which takes me to the long-term view of the defensive recruiting class. If you look at the Frogs roster they are loaded on the defensive side of the ball with young players.  This class projects to fill the long-term needs of the back seven and could help in the interior defensive line with Henderson and late signee Tevin Lawson. Both Henderson and Lawson have academic questions which sets up a hit big/ miss big scenario for the Frogs.  If they can get both kids on campus I think TCU will be in great shape for the future, but if they struggle look for the Frogs to end up looking for multiple defensive tackles in 2014 to pair with the defensive end prospects they need to sign in the 2014 class. 

 

In might sound crazy with all that happened inside the program in the spring of 2012 and the subsequent season, but the Frogs dodged some bullets at key positions during the season.  We will find out very, very quickly if they were able to address short term needs at linebacker and defensive end and the key the long-term will be Henderson and Lawson being and staying on campus next fall. Here are profiles of the players TCU projects to the defensive side of the ball in their 2013 class:

 

Mike Tuaua (6’ 3” 260lb.) – defensive end prospect from Santa Rosa Junior College in Rohnhert Park, California with the bonus of having three years of eligibility at TCU.  He broke his leg early in his time at Santa Rosa missing that season due to the injury. Tuaua was an unknown to many on signing day, but TCU had been in contact with him prior and Patterson has a very strong relationship with his JUCO coach.  It is also the same JUCO that provided TCU with cornerback Jason Verrett. 

 

You can’t find a great deal of video on Tuaua and there isn’t much available on things such as speed and lifts.   What I did find is that he went 37’+ in the shot as a freshman to place third in the junior varsity division of the 2008 North Bay League Championships held at his school, Rancho Cotate. Not really sure what happened next in his high school track career  or why he didn’t play basketball beyond his junior season when he is listed on the Rancho Cotate varsity roster.  Attached are some highlights from his high school season in 2010 when he was a tight end/ defensive end for a very good team.  There are some very positive things written about his play against Cardinal Newman and he received accolades for his senior play.  I couldn’t find much more beyond that as I couldn’t find him listed in the Rivals or Scout database for California in 2010-11.

 

What does matter though is that during his one full season in a good California Junior College League he was very productive posting over sixteen tackles for a loss and eight sacks.  TCU wants defensive linemen who can get up field and you can see watching the video Mike is a player who is pushing up field every play as hard as he possibly can go.  With the long hair, square build, and playing style he does have look about him of being the stereotypical football player with Polynesian roots. 

 

Unfortunately Tuaua won’t be on campus in the spring, but based upon comments you find about him there aren’t concerns about the type of physical condition he will report to camp. His work ethic and discipline are things you read about time and time again.  The bigger opportunity missed isn’t just his as the Frog offensive tackles could use the work against a hard charging defensive end.   Mike might be the least known of the TCU defensive recruits, but don’t be surprised if he makes the biggest impact early on as he appears to have the strength and physical style to play opposite Fields in 2013.  I can’t tell you why bigger programs didn’t pursue Tuaua in 2011 and why he seemed to fly under the radar in 2013. One though that does have some credence based upon the comments made by his JC Coach is that Mike could have opted to come back to Santa Rosa last year if he wanted because of the broken leg during his first year at the school. 

 

If the linked article is correct it was the contact by his coach, a former player for Patterson who tipped TCU off to a defensive end who was available and overlooked that he felt could step in and help the Frogs in 2013.  Patterson has a reputation for loyalty among his former players and his staff.  You don’t get that unless you do as you say and mean what you say which is Gary and I don’t think Mike was offered as a favor to a former player. That player wouldn’t have brought him to Gary’s attention if he wasn’t positive that “Big Mike” was a Patterson type of guy who could help right now and as far as I am concerned I will take the opinion of one of Gary’s former players over a “recruiting guru”.

 

http://www.theoakleafnews.com/sports/2012/10/11/even-a-broken-leg-cant-slow-down-srjc-football-star/

 

http://www.santarosa.edu/about_srjc/public-relations/news-releases/pdfs/2013%20Spring/6430-National-Signing-Day-Dreams-Come-True.pdf

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3Ljl8FPX-8

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHDOU_xxfN4

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bF3AkbFVgos

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyR3EEuKn3E

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=td-vmaFxHR4

 

http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=563581951416

 

http://ncsnblboard.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1018

 

 

BRYSON HENDERSON (6’ 4” 245 lb.) –defensive line prospect from Summit High School in Mansfield Texas.  Last year TCU signed a defensive line class with highly regarded prospect Devonte Fields,  old/ de linebacker Prospect James McFarland, and a late commit from a very raw defensive line prospect with a great frame in Terrell Lathan.  As the 2012 season played out Fields was even better than projected as he became a dominant defensive lineman by mid-season, McFarland flashed great potential and have some believing he will give the Frogs another great pass rusher off the edge, but the guy who truly surprised many with his play was Lathan. When David Johnson went down with a knee Terrell not only filled the spot in the Frogs interior defensive line rotation, but he flashed potential that he might be much more than a rotation player. With some time in the weight room and improved technique it is very easy to project Lathan as a dominant defensive tackle for the Frogs.

 

When I watched the video of Bryson Henderson I immediately thought of Lathan with even more upside potential. The reason why I say that is Henderson has that same huge frame. When you see him reach for a ball carrier his arms just seem to reach out forever, but the difference is that Henderson shows plus agility, very good flexibility, and a knack for slipping blockers that is something you don’t teach a player.  Watch the video and you see him naturally find around and force his way between blockers.  Patterson wants defensive linemen who can get up field and create havoc and you can see that on play after play of Henderson’s footage. 

 

You can also see a great deal of natural strength that belies a 245 lb. frame.  Bryson extends that inside elbow to hold off blockers while pushing up field and my favorite clip is when he craters a pulling guard from Everman with that same move.  It is not the type of strength you see built  from time in the weight room, but the type of strength that if you have makes you damn near impossible to handle solo by an offensive lineman. 

 

I haven’t heard anything that would indicate I am on to something, but I am just curious with the agility and the quickness (only measurable I could find for Henderson is a listing of a 4.8 forty time) if he could possibly play some snaps as a strong side defensive end for the Frogs. Unfortunately, none of that might come to pass if he doesn’t get his test score. Henderson doubled signed and while close he has yet to get the number.  As pointed out before I think if he gets on campus he has the potential to become a monster for the Frogs in the defensive line, but none of the matters if can get the score. 

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/556821/highlights

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA1LNKm3joE

 

 

TEVIN LAWSON ( 6’ 4” 285 lb.) – defensive tackle prospect from Denham Springs High School in Denham Springs, Louisiana.  A good friend of mine commented that the first time he saw Chucky Hunter on video his first thought was here was a stereotypical SEC defensive tackle. Hunter had a wide build, looked a  bit soft, and at the snap just created all kinds of havoc with plus quickness and agility that just didn’t seem to match his body. 

 

When I first saw video of Lawson that was my thoughts first went as I remembered a young Michael Brockers playing in Houston.  Neither will ever be that sculpted body or the first person you want off the bus if you are headed to the Venice Beach of the Big XII known as Austin.  Massive frame, long arms, and a good burst that gives them a better first ten yards than any of the last thirty which is perfect for a defensive tackle who can hold the interior against the run and collapse the interior pocket flushing the quarterback to the faster players off the edge.

 

Some have asked about Lawson possibly playing offensive tackle and he did play that position most of his senior season, but he was recruited by TCU to start at defensive tackle and that was the same as LSU.  As mentioned above, when you watch his footage at defensive tackles you see a plus burst combined with long arms that allowed him to close on ball carriers.  It is important to remember that with Lawson we are talking more tools than polish right now as Denham Springs is not a school that has poured the resources into its football program like Katy, SLC, Allen, or Denton Guyer. 

 

Much like his defensive line recruit peer Henderson, Lawson needs work and will benefit from time in the weight room, but with his size and quickness it would not be a complete surprise that he push for minutes in 2013 and allow the Frogs to red-shirt someone like Jon Lewis.  It could get interesting next fall if for the opener TCU had on the field at the same time two defensive tackles who wanted to go to TCU, got spurned, and ended up with the Frogs. 

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/637571/#highlights/41151373

 

http://tamu.247sports.com/Board/20/Tevin-Lawson-La-DT-8587201/1

 

http://canesinsight.com/showthread.php/48391-2013-UM-DT-Option-Tevin-Lawson-(LSU-Grey-Shirt)/page4

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qik8SSinPj0

 

http://lsu.247sports.com/Article/LSU-Commitment-Tevin-Lawson-Senior-Highlights-111875

 

http://lsu.247sports.com/Board/59425/Tevin-Lawson-Senior-Highlights-15920107/1#a15936786

 

http://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/p/35975065/Comments-about-Tevin-Lawson.aspx

 

http://forum.huskermax.com/vbbs/showthread.php?44193-DT-Tevin-Lawson

 

http://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/display.aspx?p=39835050&pg=5

 

http://www.latechbbb.com/forum/showthread.php?117309-Tevin-Lawson/page4

 

 

SAMMY DOUGLAS (6’3” 195 lb.) – linebacker prospect from Arlington High School in Arlington, Texas. Several years back TCU had a linebacker from Dallas SOC who I am not sure could bench his weight when he got to campus, had a better burst in the first twenty yards than forty, but Gary Spahn’s game was not about how much he could live or the time on a watch. He had unbelievable instincts, could pursue through trash somehow without getting caught up, and would just make play after play after play.  

 

Watching footage about Douglas and reading about him I get the same feeling about Sammy.  He isn’t going to grab your attention with his physical measurables (Hudl shows a 265 bench, 305 squat, 240 power clean, and 27.5” vertical), but when you watch his footage you see Sammy continually making tackles.   

 

Don’t get me wrong. Douglas has athletic ability and has run on multiple relays in track for Arlington High. Just as I don’t think Tevin Lawson will ever have that Greek god body I am not sure Sammy is the first guy you want off the bus either.  He is however a damn good linebacker prospect that Patterson can keep from saying good things about and once again we are reminded that you want guys who are football players who make great plays and not just someone who is a great looking football player.

 

Douglas has a rangy frame with long arms that when combined when a plus burst allowed him to close down high school ball carriers.  He will need to get stronger as if you watch the Kyle Hicks video you will see Sammy struggle at times physically at the point of attack versus high school offensive linemen. How big will that problem be in college? Many of the offenses in the Big XII are spread oriented , but the Frog linebackers do have to take on offensive linemen as well as the backs and receivers you are going to be asked to tackle or bigger and stronger than what you faced in high school.

 

With the depth problems at linebacker it isn’t farfetched to believe that Sammy sees time next fall.  Truth be told TCU needs at least one of the young linebackers to make an impact in 2013 and if Sammy has a good spring and summer I think he can provide some quality depth. 

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/482809/athletics

 

http://espn.go.com/colleges/psu/football/recruiting/player/videos/_/id/151765/sammy-douglas

 

http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/12/25/4507472/star-telegram-super-team-arlington.html

 

http://highschoolsportsblog.dallasnews.com/2012/11/arlington-coach-lb-sammy-douglas-the-best-defensive-player-weve-had-in-the-past-10-years.html/

 

http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/fox-sports-next-wr-lb-sammy-douglas/17bxpme7c?cpkey=2c81ac65-24fe-d5dc-631d-13ba942142f5||||

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VRvpT3_qAo

 

http://www.maxpreps.com/local/player/videos.aspx?athleteid=4c20ae4b-2c2a-4030-8aff-fa4a386dff6c&ssid=37631434-bc40-4d46-a7c5-1042c42e338c&videoid=1dbad26d-e483-0f00-234e-f78410872ea4

 

DAC SHAW (6’2” 200lb.) – linebacker prospect from Mineola High School in Mineola, Texas.  Shaw is comparable to Douglas in having a long frame with plus balance, quickness, and agility.  He looks a bit thicker to me than Sammy, but that also might be because of the difference in the players Dac is facing on video playing for 2A Mineola versus the players Douglas faced at 5A Arlington High. 

 

It doesn’t mean that Shaw isn’t a legitimate prospect or that he can’t play right away, but that sometimes you have to be careful watching the video and you see defensive lineman fall off Shaw as he runs the football.  You can see good natural strength in Shaw and he closes on the ball carrier quickly.  I couldn’t mind much on Shaw’s measurables and do know he was a multiple sport athlete at Mineola which most likely means he hasn’t spent as much time in the weight room as he will starting this summer. 

 

I have talked to some people who are very high on Dac’s potential, but I really can’t make any type of guess as to whether or not he will be able to make a contribution in 2013. 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmHVh5czVbU

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbcxUOm7b3M

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/1393817/highlights

 

PAUL WHITMILL (5’11” 200 lb.)   – linebacker prospect from Bastrop High School in Bastrop, Texas.  Paul was highly regarded as a sophomore and junior, but slipped a bit n the recruiting rankings and the biggest reason I can find is he just didn’t grow very much since his sophomore year.  I am not disagreeing with the idea of factoring in things such as frame and growth potential (especially when you consider the other two linebackers who TCU signed in this class), but I want to point out that you really can’t find too many people who will tell you that Paul stopped making the types of plays he did the two years prior.

 

Whitmill has a very solid build with a great burst of quickness and is a physical defender. It you watch his video footage you will see him playing out in coverage on multiple plays which opens up the thought that while Paul might not have the perfect size to play linebacker he physically doesn’t look that different from Derrick Kindred did playing multiple positions at SA Waggoner. 

 

TCU was very vulnerable last year with their linebackers in pass coverage which led to them running a 4-1-6 in a few games.  The Frogs didn’t sign a bigger linebacker and I am not sure if they really found a bigger linebacker in the JUCO ranks that they felt they could bring to campus and help them immediately.  I think it is very interesting with the offenses in the Big XII that Patterson has talked about moving a player like Anderson from linebacker to safety in an attempt to get faster at the position instead of bigger.

 

Consider that he specifically said he wanted to get bigger in the defensive line and I can’t claim any true incite behind the purple curtain, but I am curious if Patterson is comfortable signing multiple safety/linebacker prospects that have similar size and skills to give him the speed and flexibility to face the Big XII offenses.  If you look at players such as the three linebackers and safety prospects such as George Baltimore and Denzel Johnson there are very common physical traits and abilities in all five prospects.

 

Following that line of thinking I think Whitmill is a great example of a prospect who isn’t as highly regarded by some schools who don’t run the 4-2-5 and more importantly don’t have Gary’s eye for finding those kids who seem to not quite fit in one position, but have the speed and physical nature needed to excel in the Frogs system.   If you watch the footage you can see Whitmill’s ability to tackle in the open field and his physical style which is complimented by above average quickness.  As with Douglass, Paul has run on Bastrop’s 4 x 100, 4 x 200, and 4 x 400 meter relays the past two seasons. 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdOHGnyjUZ0

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/883613/highlights/20659373

 

http://www.maxpreps.com/athletes/aSZusrEgQUKmQviac2h5wQ/football-fall-11/hudl-paul-whitmill.htm

 

http://www.maxpreps.com/athletes/dSmCZcgH_0qwYabuQM2qHA/football-fall-10/hudl-paul-whitmill.htm

 

GEORGE BALTIMORE (6’ 205 lb.) – safety prospect from Mansfield High School in Mansfield, Texas. Baltimore is a thick, powerfully built safety prospect who fits into the description I just described above about Paul Whitmill. In fact, the two remind me a bit of each other.

 

George played a traditional safety at Mansfield and showed good instincts to compliment plus quickness and a willingness to be physical.  I talked with a few people who think he is a bit stiff in coverage, but I think he can handle any of the three safety positions for the Frogs.  He posted a best time of 11.25 in the 100 M as a sophomore and has consistently run in the range of 4.55 -4.6.  this means he runs well enough and a reported vertical of 33” shows good explosion through the hips combined with a best of 265 on the bench according to HUDL. 

 

The thought by many is that Baltimore will first see time at free safety, but as mentioned before I would not be surprised to see him end up playing closer to the line of scrimmage.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cA1hsoLoEOo

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/373884/highlights

 

http://texas.247sports.com/Article/Mansfields-George-Baltimore-brings-a-lot-to-the-table-449

 

DENZEL JOHNSON (6’2” 205 lb.) – safety/athlete prospect from Gainesville High School in Gainesville, Texas.  Johnson is a prospect who didn’t gather much attention until late in the process, but if you read around on a few blogs his name did start to pop up the middle of his senior season and one blogger compared him to current Frog Sam Carter. 

 

So why the low profile? There was a time when D-1 prospects were common at Gainesville as they were one of the strongest 3A programs in the state.  Time passes and when you have turnover at the head coaching position word doesn’t always circulate the way it should for some prospects.  Don’t confuse however the lack of recognition for a lack of athletic ability. Johnson has a long frame with great balance and agility. HUDL posts best of 4.5 in the forty, a 37” vertical, 290 bench press, and a 400 pound squat. 

 

What you need to remember on those last two numbers is that Denzel is a four sport athlete for Gainesville having started three years of varsity football, three years of varsity basketball, and four years of varsity baseball. Not a great deal of down time which also means he hasn’t spent a great deal of time in the weight room like he will for the Frogs.   Johnson is a raw prospect on the football field and his name has been tossed around for multiple possible positions in his future. The thought is that he will start on defense at safety and things will take their course from there.

 

The best part of Johnson though might not be his athletic ability. Talking to people in the area he is a leader and a competitor.  One person pointed out that he has started since a freshman for Gainesville playing baseball in a district in which they are on the short end of the stick when it comes to resources and players.  Hasn’t mattered to him as he comes to compete regardless of the mismatch with stronger district teams (i.e. Argyle) and that says a great deal to me about Johnson. 

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/1451264/highlights/18299378

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gn2qZkmxjY

 

http://insidetexas.com/news/story_print.php?article=4164

 

STEVE WESLEY (6’ 175 lb.) – cornerback prospect from Bowie High School in Arlington, Texas.  Wesley was an early pledge for the Frogs and played for an established program in Bowie, but it is tough to find much about him. 

 

What I could find is that most sites had him listed at 4.6 or under in the forty, there is no video footage on YouTube or HUDL, and I really could not find much in terms of individual track times (He was listed on Bowie’s 4 x 100 and 4 x 200 relay teams).  Look around and didn’t find much combine information so what does any of this mean?

 

Not really much when you consider that Clay Jennings has earned himself a very solid reputation in finding talent and that if he and Patterson felt Steve deserved an offer that is good enough for me. True, that doesn’t score very high on the services rating scales, but once again Wesley might be a kid who doesn’t fit in all systems, but TCU thinks he will excel in their scheme.  I have heard comparison’s in body build to Greg McCoy with the same quick burst.  No real way to know if he has McCoy’s top end speed, but also consider that in the Frogs scheme if you have a very physical corner, with plus feet and quickness they can be very, very effective moving inside to the weak safety position.  Elisha Olabode?  I realize is sounds like an easy out to say I will put more faith in Patterson and his staff than the recruiting sites, but it also is a pretty solid decision based upon their track record of knowing the skills and traits they must have to make a position work in their scheme. 

 

http://wap.rivals.com/newsdetail.asp?CID=1387492

 

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football-recruiting/2012/6/11/3078791/steve-wesley-tcu-horned-frogs-football-recruiting-2013

 

RANTHONY TEXADA (5’ 10” 160 lb.) – cornerback prospect from Centennial High School in Frisco, Texas.  Texada might be closer to 5’9” than 5’ 10” but that is the only thing that separates him from being considered an elite cornerback prospect.  He shows great burst on the ball, plus instincts, footwork, and hips.   

 

Granted he did struggle against Tyler John Tyler’s Fred Ross in the play-offs last year I think Texada is a great prospect when you consider the offenses TCU is facing in the Big XII and the challenge faced in chasing many of the smaller faster receivers.  He didn’t back down from Ross and while he will never be a big corner he has the build to get stronger combined with great natural speed ( 4.33 in the 40M, 10.5 in the 100M, and 22.94 in 200M) . 

 

Jennings for some reason hasn’t got the credit he deserves for his job with the Frog corners, but I can’t wait to see how he develops Texada.  Ranthony has great natural confidence, is smart, great instincts, is a play maker with the ball in his hands, and the type of burst you can’t teach.  I would not be shocked if Texada pushed for the fourth cornerback spot in 2013.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXZtkTaS5zM

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiBG8WpfSmY

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLOPveAPByE

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=douWJ-UOVio

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1F6a8iusq84

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/521109/highlights/36504436

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWp1UdGyRJs

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euN5_0VzxnA

 

http://wisconsin.247sports.com/Board/23/Texas-CB-visiting-Madison–7559755/1

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyI_Hbv2yHY

 

http://www.ncsasports.org/football-recruiting/tx/frisco/centennial-high-school3/ranthony-texada1

 

CYDNEY CALVIN (6’ 1” 175 lb.) – cornerback prospect from Centennial High School in Frisco, Texas.  Some have earmarked Denzel Johnson as the sleeper of this class, but the guy to me who flew under the radar and could be this years Derrick Kindred is Cydney Calvin. 

 

No slight to Denzel as I love the potential I bring to the Frogs, but Calvin is a guy who you won’t find anyone writing about for a very good reason.  Up until the middle of his senior season he was a good high school receiver who was moved to cornerback to try to solidify the position opposite the above mentioned Ranthony Texada.  Roughly two months later he has Jennings and Patterson in his home offering him a scholarship to play the boundary corner position for the Frogs. 

 

For those not convinced with the belief that Patterson and Jennings know what they are looking for in defensive backs also consider that Calvin is 6’1” with the wingspan that matches a 6’3” body, has run under 4.5 in the forty, run a 4.01 shuttle, and has a 34” vertical leap.   So, long body with long arms, very good feet, and plus speed.

 

So why nothing earlier?  I can’t tell you why the coaches at Centennial weren’t playing him at cornerback, but what I know is at the end of the year he was starting opposite Texada for a team that made a deep run in the play-offs.  Yes, he is raw, but you can see the instincts in finding the football in the video and as I said before I have great faith in Jennings ability to take that frame, agility, quickness, and instincts and mold him into a great corner just as Clay has done before for the Frogs. 

 

http://highschoolsportsblog.dallasnews.com/2013/02/how-cydney-calvin-went-from-frisco-centennial-receiver-to-tcu-cornerback.html/

 

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/521100/#highlights/26969375

The Cockroach Bowl

goldenawardLast year in Texas we saw the end of a Thanksgiving tradition as long back as I can remember as Texas and A&M played their last game as members of the Big XII conference. There really isn’t much reason to go into the why’s of the things that have not taken place nor place blame.  Seems to me the best thing to do is not focus on the past, but move forward. 

 

Progress doesn’t always bring the changes we want or like and in some cases doesn’t even keep us at the status quo. What it does do however is force us to adapt and change with the new environment and if college football fans have become acutely aware of anything over the past 5-10 years is that change is happen at a rapid pace whether we what it or like it. 

 

As a TCU alum and in the spirit of the season I am thankful the Frogs have indeed landed in what seems to be for the moment a viable BCS conference.  Granted all that could change in the time it takes a couple of television network executives to have a cup of coffee, but I would call any TCU alum or fan a damn fool if they truly believe the Frogs are not better off in the Big XII at this time facing the changing future of college football that had the school stayed in the MWC or made the jump to the Big East. 

 

The season hasn’t gone the way many had hoped and I can’t imagine any one had thought, but if anything TCU has shown there is more depth to their program than many thought and find themselves in a position with two games to go to end up with a winning season.  Small catch is that they are in the second game of the three game gauntlet that has them closing with KSU, Texas, and then OU. 

 

Unfortunately, many Texas alums and fans don’t approach the game tomorrow with the same interest and zeal as they had when playing the Ags no matter how much they loudly avow for all to hear they are glad to be rid of A&M.  In all honesty, the only real rival TCU has had that I can truly recall is SMU and it has been over sixty years since that game really mattered outside Tarrant and Dallas counties (It could be argued that for many in those counties it didn’t matter much either.).  Additionally, our conference hopping through the WAC, CUSA, and the MWC on our way to the Big XII really hasn’t allowed for any new rivalries to truly form. A point can be made that while in the MWC TCU did have some very spirited games with Utah and BYU along with the three games with Boise, but there is no way to spin that any of those series of games truly became something that equaled a true heated rivalry or at least any type of tradition. 

 

Those are things that can’t be forced and I fully understand there is no way UT –TCU can captivate the State of Texas the way the Horns and the Ags did for all those years and I don’t have visions of this being a heated rivalry.  What I can see happening is that it being a competitive series and that is good with me.  Unfortunately, we can be the marquee team like say ND that some Horn fans felt would be more appropriate for Texas to play on Thanksgiving and many of those are the very same people who love to throw around the infamous cockroach quote by Darrell Royal. 

 

“They are like a cockroach. It isn’t what he eats or totes off but what he falls into and messes up.”
— After the No. 1-ranked Longhorns were upset 6-0 by TCU in 1961

 

What I have always found interesting about those UT alums and fans is that they know the quote, but don’t know the context.  DKR came to UT in 1957 and in his first five seasons only one team had a winning record against him, Abe Martin’s TCU teams.  The Frogs were 3-2 against the Horns and in 1960 Texas had to hang on to beat TCU 3-2.  TCU won conference titles in 1958 and 1959 so it wasn’t as if the Frog teams that beat UT were bad ball clubs.  I can’t tell you if Martin and Royal didn’t get along, respected each other, or if it was just a matter of DKR being frustrated over struggling with the Frogs in those first five years that prompted him to say what he did, but it would be safe to say that it is the most memorable quote about the series between the two schools. 

 

It is interesting to me that both Martin and Royal until recently were considered the best coaches who have ever roamed the sidelines for both schools and now that the two schools prepare to begin the series again the coaches for each school would be considered the new standard bearers for their respective programs. Both have lifted the schools to a level of success that hasn’t been seen in decades and both have been the lynchpins in significant growth and development of facilities, revenues, and exposure of the schools.  Finally, both schools come into this game at the end of seasons that haven’t gone exactly to plan.  Texas finds itself in position to finish the year in a stronger position in terms of ranking, but both programs want to use the end of the season and the bowl game as a spring board into bigger things next year.   

 

Texas is favored and seems to have addressed some of the demons that plagued the team earlier this season. TCU unfortunately hasn’t been able to remedy its problems on offense and coming into this game it appears things would be set for a Texas win, but it isn’t farfetched to believe the Frogs can hold their own tomorrow night. Many have already expressed a believe that there just isn’t any way for the Frogs to score enough to keep up with the Texas offense, but the blueprint was provided by Stanford in their win over Oregon last week. 

 

The Cardinal are not a very good offensive team this year.  The only times they have scored over 27 points in a game are when they played the #99, #100, and #120 ranked scoring defenses in the country. On paper there was no way possible a Stanford team that averaged 28 points a game could go into Autzen stadium and beat a UO team that averaged 51 a game and coming into the game last week had not scored fewer than 42 points in any game to that point in the season.  So what happened?  Stanford dominated the line of scrimmage, limited their mistakes and they made the big plays when needed to pull out an improbable victory. 

 

Granted, the TCU offense is not the Stanford offense, the Texas defense has more talent than the UO defense, and   the TCU defense struggled in the one game it played against a team as balanced offensively as Texas (i.e. Oklahoma State.). So is it blind Frog pride that has me thinking TCU can pull this game out? No, because I have seen Patterson ready his teams in these types of situations in the past, Texas is not invincible; maybe the spirit of the 1961 cockroaches will inhabit that field again. 

 

Just like the Cardinal it will be up to the TCU defense to set the tone in this game. I truly believe the group is really unknown to many as I continue to read how Texas will be able to wear down the Frogs front. That might happen, but if that is the case it will be youth and not size in the front. Pierson, Hunter, and Lewis are all over 290 and Latham is bigger than the 265 they list him.  Additionally, the return of Maponga has been critical for the Frogs front as was seen in the game in Stillwater. The only big key for TCU is the emergence of Marcus Mallet.  Joel Hasley had started to become a folk hero to some, but there is no way he is the same size as Cain and Mallet and we saw Mallet making his presence felt against KSU. The question will be does youth use the energy of this game being on national television to elevate their play or do they get overwhelmed.

 

If the Frogs can slow the Texas running game they have a chance, but they also must deal with an issue that has plagued them all year and it has been a staple of the Horns big offensive days.  TCU has hurt numerous times this year on first and second downs especially in play action and David Ash has been his most effective throwing early in the downs. 

 

Consider that Gary Patterson has said multiple times that aside of comparing points scored versus points allowed the numbers he looks at the most are the Frogs offense 3rd down conversion percentage versus the percentage converted by opposing offenses.  This year (minus the stats for the Grambling game) opposing offenses have converted only 28% of the time on third down which is a solid number.  Looking at those numbers you would have to think the defense has been winning on first down to set up difficult third down situations for the opposing offenses, but that hasn’t been the case.  TCU has allowed opposing offenses to average over 4 yards a rush which is over a yard more than the average rush the Frogs have allowed opposing offenses for the season. That isn’t what worries me going into the Texas game.  The concern is that if the Frogs can’t control the line of scrimmage against the Texas offense they will start bringing up their safeties which has been effective, but exposes the Frog corners (especially White) and the young safety Hackett.  Opposing offenses have averaged over 15.0 yards per completion on first down against the Frogs with multiple passes of 40+ yards. 

 

TCU can not allow those big plays to Texas and it will be interesting to see if Patterson stays back even if the Frogs struggle against the run or if they attack and risk getting beat by the Horn receivers deep as we have seen happen to more than one Texas opponent this year. Patterson has said that in the Big XII the key is for a defense to change touchdown drives into field goals.  It was Tech did to TCU and what TCU did to WVU in Morgantown.  How do you do that though?  The simplest answer is the Frog defensive front play their best game of the year and disrupt the Texas running game, but are they ready to take over a game? 

 

Offensively TCU must find some consistency in the running game.  They had some success against KSU until Boykin got hurt and Tucker is the healthiest he has been all season.  If it was a time for the big back for Tyler to fulfill the potential he brought to campus this would be the game.  TCU must have a credible presence in the running game to keep Boykin from having to win the game. If they can’t do this than it could become a very long night as I don’t really want to think about the Frog tackles trying to pass block the athletes Texas can bring off the edge defensively. 

 

There is one other thing that sticks in the back of my mind and it is a trend Patterson has had on the road in big games and that is to go deep early. He did it at Utah and we saw it at Boise.  Boykin is not the precision passer TCU had with Casey and I don’t see him being able to carry the team by going 40 out of 50 against the Texas defense. I can see however TCU taking early shots deep and the track record has not always been the receiver you would expect.  It was Boyce at Utah and he did catch one against Boise, but that was Carter’s breakout game and the guy I think could do it tomorrow would be LaDarius Brown. He is still raw as a route runner, but you can’t teach 6’4” and 220, runs well, and as he showed against Tech can go up for the ball over smaller defensive backs. 

 

The bottom line is that no matter how we want to sound smart when we play this what if games prior that it still comes down to the same basics. Which ever team controls the line of scrimmage, eliminates mistakes, and isn’t afraid to win will come out ahead tomorrow night. Just like Abe and DKR preached to their teams over fifty years ago.

Be Careful What You Ask

CowSometime midweek of the TCU – Iowa State game a friend sent me a link to a thread on a TCU fan site. The thread was started about the Boise State football team’s equipment truck striking a cow and included a picture of the cab of the truck.  Two replies stood out among the various comments and attempts at being clever.  The first was how the TCU football program resembled the cab in that both were damaged and covered in blood and shit.  This comment garnered more than a few replies of approval, but it also brought about a very salient reply to the direction of the program in that both the truck and the TCU program despite recent turn of events were both still moving forward.

When TCU lost to Iowa State the result was received by many a naysayer as further validation that the Frogs record over the last decade had been built upon beating weaker opponents and that the Frogs had made huge mistake jumping into a conference they just weren’t ready to compete with “legitimate” football programs.  I think most Frog fans and alums have heard the same comments, the same reasons as to why TCU just won’t be able to compete in the Big 12 again and again and again since it was announced last fall that TCU would be joining the conference in 2012 instead of the Big East.  We have heard the same misguided thoughts, the same erroneous reasons by people who did little but take a cursory glance at the Frog program and then make sweeping assumptions to validate their theory the Frogs had benefitted from a weaker conference and would soon be relegated back to level of program TCU found itself at the end of the SWC.

TCU lost to a very sound, very well coached team, which played hard and didn’t make many mistakes in Iowa State.  The Cyclones knew what they wanted to try to do against the TCU defense and played physical and aggressive defensive against the Frog offense.  None of that however was unique to the Big 12 and the result of that game would have most likely been the same had the Frogs been playing Utah, Boise, BYU, SDSU, or Air Force under the same circumstances.  That one game however was not indicative of TCU’s ability to compete in the Big XII and didn’t reveal as some had proclaimed that TCU was the “faux” program of the conference.

That game did however underscore what I think most reasonable TCU alums and supporters knew going into this year. Top to bottom the Big 12 was much stronger than the MWC and once conference play began TCU would need to be sharp in each game.  Any attempt to prove the Frogs inability to compete with a single is just as flawed as using the Baylor and West Virginia games individually as proof the Frogs competitively belonged in the conference. That would be passed upon their body of work and five games into the conference I think it is safe to say that the Frogs have represented themselves well in light of the player losses, young players, and learning a new conference.

Many of the naysayers for the program will brush these occurrences off and in most cases haven’t even watched a game.  Additionally, if you press them they really can’t tell you too much of what has happened at TCU since last season or have much knowledge of the team aside from the four players arrested and Casey’s most recent problems.  In all honesty I don’t expect them because many of these people are the same ones who last spring were talking about how small TCU was up front in the defensive line or the only reason why the Frogs receiving corps is so highly regarded is because of the bad secondaries in the MWC.  They complain about their teams have been hampered by injury and yet TCU is the program that supposedly the program that doesn’t have enough depth to compete in the Big 12.

Consider for a minute all the things that have happened to the TCU program since last year. Some of this has been the fodder of multiple websites, newspaper articles, blogs, and radio talk shows, but a good deal of it just gets bypassed.  Whether it is a matter of ignorance, laziness, or just not caring by those throwing the darts at the program really doesn’t matter because even if they do give full recognition of the circumstances really doesn’t do much to help Patterson and his staff have this team be competitive each and every week.  I understand that the perception of the program can be from a sales perspective (i.e. recruiting) be far more powerful from the truth, but I really don’t care about what a writer in a paper, some people on message boards, or talking heads on radio have to say about the TCU program.  Their job is to generate ad revenue for their given mediums and TCU has definitely given them something to write/talk about over the past few months.  It is only right that I recognize that a good number of these losses and events have been self-inflicted. Prior to the 2011 season Sports Illustrated did an article on Gary Patterson that foreshadowed a bit the events that have unfolded in Fort Worth.  Gary made mention of the fact he was having trouble getting a handle on the identity of that team, they there were a few players who he called sneaky, and there were whispers from the program that the staff was having trouble getting the team to embrace practice with the same  enthusiasm and effort as the 2009 and 2010 teams. Those teams were known for their work effort in practice and the leadership among the older players. You will have a hard time finding someone using those same words about the 2011 team.  The team did not respond well after the loss to Baylor in practice for the year and you could see the results over the course of the season.  For the first time in many seasons in Fort Worth the team just didn’t seem to respond in practice and if you know anything about the TCU program you know TCU demands as much from their players in practice as any program in the Big 12. Patterson wants high tempo, high effort, and the team just didn’t respond.

It is far too easy to lay the blame at the feet of the TCU four or add Casey to the equation, but there is little doubt that instead of a sense of obligation to match the efforts of prior teams there was a sense of entitlement. It sounds crazy to those who remember the bleak days of FA Dry like I do, but some players in the program felt all they needed to do was play hard on Saturdays and you saw it in their play on the field last season and to some extent early this year.  We have seen in the weeks that have followed the ISU loss that this team recognizes to win on Saturday means to do what they need to do the rest of the week.  That is a lesson that unfortunately and to some degree tragically wasn’t acknowledged by some players that not only hurt the program, but might cost them future opportunities.

The lessons aren’t just for the players, but the staff as well.  Yes, the loss of players has been an exceptional number, but to dismiss the reasons is folly.  I truly believe that any coach and program that has been successful over time does so without from time to time re-evaluating itself looking for ways to improve.  Patterson and his staff are in a unique position in that this is the third time they have jumped conferences, changed competitive environments, and had to make changes to ensure each years’ team and the overall program would be competitive.  What they need to be careful of those is presuming that this jump is the same as those in the past, forgetting that each situation is unique, and to truly do the holistic evaluation of all phases of the program that is needed to be competitive. They must be honest with themselves in truly identifying their strengths, their weaknesses, and addressing the things they can control.  Yes, no other team in the conference has lost over a quarter of its roster in this short a period of time, but every TCU alum/fan who uses that stat as an explanation for the season also must acknowledge that TWELVE of the players are no longer part of the team for academic, legal, and person reasons.  Just as injuries seem to run in streaks so down these type of issues, but just as a string of injuries would trigger an evaluation of what is being down to avoid such problems as well as what might have contributed to it the same must be done (and I have no reason to believe it has not been now or won’t continue into the future) for losses due to academics and other issues.   Additionally, Gary needs to make sure that each of the staff is not only willing to do the job, but capable. It shouldn’t be lost on those watching the Frogs the impact Randy Shannon has made on the linebacker position. Marcus Mallet has given the defense two legitimate college sized linebackers and I loved the way the kid brought the wood at the very end of the K-State game after the outcome was decided.  You can see the same impact Haverty has had on the safeties (love the development of Kendred).  I specifically am thinking of Williamson and Burns.

Each time the level of competition has increased for the Frogs the margin of error grows smaller.  The budgets for competing programs are bigger, alums and fan bases larger, media exposure more extensive, and overall talent on the roster deeper.  It simply means that for TCU to remain competitive each year they can’t lose a number of players, no matter how small for reasons that could have been avoided even if it means not offering a scholarship. 

Patterson, his staff, and the TCU players are not the only ones thought who should be careful for the remainder of the year and the near future.  TCU has shown in the exception of every game in the conference to date with the exception of the OSU game that they would going to fight down to the end and the only time they have looked completely overmatched is the second half of the game in Stillwater. That might change in their next three games with KSU, UT, and OU, but the point remains that with a team comprised of 2/3 of sophomores and freshmen TCU could just as easily be 5-1 in conference as they are 3-3.  

More importantly the talent base is in place on the defensive side of the ball and if the Frogs can get a little more depth at defensive tackle, cornerback, defensive end, and linebacker this could be one of the league’s better groups next year (I would not be surprised to see TCU go after JUCO help at those positions to compliment the current talent on campus and their 2013 signees).  Offensively the hill is a bit steeper.  The receiver group next year will compare with any in the conference and I think if James can return from the knee the Frogs will have a good combination of backs. The key will be stability in the offensive line and more consistent play from the quarterback position. Right now it is impossible to truly judge how much progress Boykin has made or if he is going to develop into a legitimate Big 12 quarterback behind the TCU offensive line. The young players they have at offensive tackle are playing hard, but they just aren’t very good and the line is easily the worst they have had in some time.  A year in the conditioning program will do a great deal for the young players, but this again is an area I fully expect TCU to seek JUCO help.  If the past year has proven anything it is that you can plan for the long term, but have to be able to adapt on the short term.  I truly believe this team can make a big move in 2013 in the Big 12, but that means a solid ground game and allowing the quarterback time to get the ball down the field.  Two things they aren’t getting right now and that has to be priority one for the TCU off-season.

The Frogs have shown great progress on the defensive side and every game to date has been on either a national broadcast or regional broadcast on a network people actual no had to find and watch.  Don’t down play the bump in recruiting for TCU as they have only been truly run off the field in one game with two to play. 

Finally the supporters of the program better be ready to step up and back this team. That means getting your asses out of the parking lot and into the stadium. You might be surprised what you find once you get inside.

Should we catch up?

Well, so far it looks like Ash is the real deal. Who would have thought that the defense would be a concern at this point?

Unfortunately for me and Davy, it would seem that Ft. Worth as been in the news far too often for me. I have never seen a program lose as many players as TCU has in less than 1 year. 10 starters!? 20 Overall? What ticks me off is that everyone I know thinks that all of the players leaving were party related, when it has been 5. Much obliged, Ft. Worth police. I don’t condone what they ( the kids ) did, but with the hype around the press conference I thought one of the cartels got brought down. 4 misdemeanors and a total of $1200 in fines. In the mean time, Mizzou gets 5 players busted for smoking the stuff, including our old friend DGB, and you can find nary a word about it on any of the major sports web sites. Bias towards the SEC, or just business as usual in the SEC?

Now that Pachall is gone until at least 2013, does TCU try to recruit another 1-2 qb’s in this class, or do they wait until 2014 to help shore up depth at that position?

The Amoeba Comes to Austin

amoebaAs a kid growing up in Dallas long before the multiple ESPN channels brought us non-stop college basketball from November until March and the CBS contract with the NCAA brought us every game of the tournament you rarely got a glimpse of college teams outside your area or were an elite program one national broadcast a week on NBC.

Teams like Jerry Tarkanian’s UNLV squads of the mid 1970’s were almost  mythical as they were never seen on television and the only way you knew about them at the time was by reading about them in Sports Illustrated, Sport Magazine, and The Sporting News.  Granted, they played some bad competition, but consider some of the numbers.  The 1975-76 team averaged 110.5 points a game and the 1976 team that went to the Final Four that season broke the 100 point mark in 23 of their 32 games that season.  In an era where there was no shot clock or three-point line the Rebels leading scorer Eddie Owens averaged more points per game than minutes played. 

 A common misconception is that Tark’s early Vegas teams didn’t play much defense and instead just played run-and-gun, but that isn’t accurate. They employed constant full court pressure on the ball, looked to trap in the corners, and aggressively defended at the rim.  They were fast, aggressive, and physical. It is no accident that in the 1976 game against Hawaii  Hilo in which they scored 164 points, they had more rebounds than baskets made (86 rebounds to 73 field goals) and totaled a school record 26 steals. 

Fast forward to Tark’s 1990 and 1991 teams and you don’t find the same withering, full-court pressure, but instead you find the same principles of ball pressure, trapping in the corners, cutting off passing lanes, and defending aggressively at the rim now played in the famous “amoeba defense”. If you Google the term you will find multiple sites that break down the defense (For those who really want to know I have copied a couple of them  http://www.coachesclipboard.net/Animations/FlashAmoebaDefense.html  and http://www.hoopsu.com/amoeba-defense and I know that you can also find a clip of Tark at a whiteboard describing the defense.).

 Now, I am sure you are convinced by now is more applicable to Rick Barnes than Texas football, but give me just a minute (more like 30 minutes)  to make the connection.  Jerry Tarkanian unfortunately is remembered more for being a huge pain in the NCAA’s butt than the fact he is one of the most brilliant defensive minds in college basketball history.  Some might counter that Tark simply pressed weaker teams earlier in his career and ran a tricked up version of a diamond and one later, but they are missing some key points.

 First, Tark had the the ability to adapt defensive schemes and still keep apply the same basic principles.  This might sound simple, but how often have we seen a coach in multiple sports stick with the one style that made them successful. It is rare to find a successful coach who takes his basic principles and applies it through a different scheme.  Tark did this with the amoeba in the 1980’s and 1990’s.  The Rebels still tried to make it difficult to advance the ball in the offensive end by the dribble with direct ball pressure, still looked to trap in the corners,  gamble in the passing lanes, and aggressively defend at the rim, but now it was done over 42 feet instead of 84. 

 I can’t tell you how the change came to pass. Whether it was part of an single decision to change by Tarkanian or simply an adaption over time to changes in how the game was being played.  What I can tell you is that the scheme employed by the 1990-1991 UNLV team was tactically different from the team of the mid 1970’s, but strategically the same.

 Second, that as great as any scheme might be on paper the ability for the players running that scheme to handle multiple functions truly elevate the scheme to its highest level.  Look no farther in this case than the UNLV teams of the early 1990’s that played Duke in back to back title games. Greg Anthony and Anderson Hunt game the Rebels two physical guards with exceptional lateral quickness making them both excellent on the ball defenders and threats to drop back in the passing lanes.  Larry Johnson, Stacey Augmon, and David Butler game Tark a trio of three very athletic big men who could easily come out to the corner to assist on the trap, strong enough to defend the low post, and defend at the rim.  The combination gave the Rebels a group that took the defense to its highest form by being able to shift the configuration of the defense to match the attacking offense and still apply Tark’s core defensive principles.  In summation, those five gave Tark the ability to play with greater flexibility and more possibilities than any other five defenders in his coaching career.

 In talking with friends who are coaches things really are not that different when it comes to football. In the end there are just so many ways to align eleven defenders; there are only so many ways to approach an offense.  There are far better people on these sites who can do a much better job of detailing the evolution of the cat and mouse game between offenses and defenses.  They are also better qualified to cover the impact of various rule changes, but there is no doubt that ever since the NCAA made the decision to move the hash marks in closer to the center of the field and switch to a ball more like the shape of the NFL that we have seen a dramatic shift in the college game from being dominated by run heavy offenses to being a game that at times more resembles flag football than the game played back in the 1970’s.  The interesting thing to me is the broad diversity of offenses we now see in college football.  Long gone are the days when many programs ran the ball 90% of the time and a wide-open offense might throw it 20-25 times. 

For the most part gone are the days of four in a backfield and two tight ends and I truly can’t remember the last time I saw a high school game in which one of the teams did not use some version of the spread.  Damn do I feel old as I can recall when Tom Landry caught flack for installing the “old shotgun” formation with Roger Staubach lining up in the tailback position.  Why the nostalgia?  Simply that college defensive co-ordinators must prepare for an array of offenses that range from pro-style to option based to five wide out formations for a team throwing 60-70 times a game.  The diversity is such that even if we say a team runs a spread formation it doesn’t indicate whether they are a run focused offense or pass heavy.  Interestingly, if you look at the BCS title games since 2003 we have seen a variety of offensive styles on systems. Pro-style,  traditional run based offenses, spread option, and spread passing offenses. 

 So where am I headed with all of this?  College defensive staffs face an impossible task in today’s game.  They must try to stop a multitude of offenses and do so with a game that has become skewed towards offensive football.  People accurately point to the rules changes in the NFL and the impact on the professional game.  You can’t argue the game is a far cry from the game once played by the pros where receivers had to literally fight their way off the line of scrimmage, ball carriers were literally open targets for defenders, and I once attended a play-off game in the Cotton Bowl that end 5-0.  With all the changes in favor of the offense you can see where the rules changes were made to protect players and there have been adjustments made in an attempt to at least give defenses some chance. Remember that in response to offenses run a hurry-up scheme the NFL declared that the defense must be allowed to make personnel substitutions. We don’t see that in college where offenses run to the line, then stop, waiting for the coaches to scan the defense, and signal in plays. 

 Many college defenses have tried to adjust by going away conventional defensive alignments to schemes than use hybrid players (i.e. 3-3-5 or 4-2-5) in an attempt to increase the number of faster, smaller players on the field and still be able to stop the run. 

It isn’t hard to find articles about these schemes on the internet and it plays to something I have always found interesting about coaches.  You would never find McDonald’s inviting executives from Burger King and Wendy’s to a McDonald’s training academy so they could learn how to make French fries the McDonald’s way, but there are multiple examples of coaches helping hated rivals by teaching them the in’s and out’s of a specific scheme. 

 If you are someone who likes to do the reading here is a great site on the 4-2-5 defense:

 http://coachhoover.blogspot.com/2011/12/4-2-5.html

 Coach Hoover is a great site and if I recommend reading Patterson’s article on the 4-2-5 from 1997 that he wrote will the defensive co-ordinator at New Mexico.  Closest I could find is this great piece from the blog site DoubleT Nation about Patterson’s defense. 

 http://www.doubletnation.com/tags/multiplicity-but-simplicity

  As well as this great work from Brophy Football:

 http://brophyfootball.blogspot.com/2011/09/tcu-defense-explained.html

 Patterson’s defense isn’t perfect, but it is an example of a defense with easy to find explanations that all point to the idea of a team trying to offset the variety of offenses they will face by using one defensive style that has the ability to adjust and attack whatever they might face weekly over the course of a season.  Teaching one system simplifies the learning process for the players and provides a baseline of knowledge and position expectations the staff can build upon. For example, TCU is going to expect their linebackers to be able to do certain specific things to effectively play the position.  Any additional things will be a byproduct of other abilities on an individual player, how they pair with the other linebacker, and fits into the strengths of the defense that given year.  The last is a key point that is oft overlooked when people talk scheme.  Just because you line-up in the same basic formation each season doesn’t mean the staff is going to ask or expect the same thing from each defense.  Linked below is an interview with Patterson in which he addresses the need to vary the defense each year to match the abilities of its personnel:

 http://www.footballscoop.com/news/4232-gary-patterson-explains-the-most-important-thing-about-great-defense

 I guess that was a very long way to go that even when you have a coach who has made his reputation with a specific scheme that in the end the diversification of the scheme itself is limited by the ability of the players in the scheme.  It isn’t a very new concept and any coach who is very smart long ago learned that maximizing the abilities of a player or players is more important than sticking to their specific scheme come hell or high water.  Another example is discussed in this SI.com story about the Zone Blitz. 

 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/tim_layden/01/31/zone-blitz/index.html

 Dick LeBeau sites the desire to use the unique abilities of David Fulcher as an one of the lynchpins for the evolution of his zone blitz defensive scheme during this time in Cincinnati. Remember that Fulcher was huge for an NFL safety at the time and LeBeau basically could change the defensive formation by where Fulcher was on the field at a given time and not by substitution. This flexibility was unique in the NFL at the time and something we see LeBeau leverage today in Steeler safety Troy Polamalu.

 As with the 4-2-5 it isn’t hard to find multiple pieces about the zone-blitz or the fire-zone blitz and while the scheme is important it still comes down to this basic idea that I found expressed very well on Brophy Football:

” One of the biggest mistakes for those learning the game of football is to fixate on the minutiae of various “brands” of defense.  Tying oneself to the dogmatic thinking and going-through-the-motions of “how we’ve always done it” without understanding the rationale of how it all works creates an intelligence rut that becomes a liability.  Defenses exist to defense an offense – they do not exist within vacuums.  On every play you’re defending something the offense is doing to advance the ball.  For this reason, defenses aren’t static entities – they must respond (adapt) to the stimuli they are presented with.   You will hear people declare, “we are a 3-4 Quarters defense” or something to that effect.  That’s great, but there is a reason a defensive concept is employed on a given down, and there is no catch-all defense available.”

 

To go one step further in the very same article you will find a link to a Boston Herald interview with Bill Belichick. Here is just a small excerpt:

 At the Browns we played a 4-3,” Belichick said. “We won two Super Bowls playing a 4-3. In ’01 and (‘04). Second half of the ’01 season, we played 4-3 after Bryan Cox and (Ted) Johnson got hurt.”

And he was just getting warmed up…

In all honesty, most people thought we played a 4-3 at the Giants,” Belichick said. “Lawrence Taylor did a lot more rushing than he did pass dropping. He was probably 90 percent of the time, 80 to 90 percent of the time he was the rusher in the defense. Now not every play was a pass, but certainly in passing situations and on a lot of pass plays, he was the designated fourth rusher which really put us in what amounts to a 4-3. I think honestly that’s something that’s a media fabrication. There are a lot of different alignments out there, you see 4-3 teams use odd spacing, you see 3-4 teams use even spacing.”

Here is a link to the rest of the article:

http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sports/blitz/index.php/2011/08/05/professor-belichick-slaps-4-3-talk-as-a-media-fabrication-then-explains-why/

Once again we see the very basic idea of a great defensive coach giving a great player the freedom to make plays and use their abilities instead of trying to force them in a specific role in a specific scheme.

Bottom line is that building a defense doesn’t start with picking a scheme, but making a decision what your priorities are going to be, what type of tactics you wish to employ to address those priorities, and then deciding what is the best way to align your personnel. 

Consider these comments from Coach Hoover’s Football about Bill Belichick’s comments from a 2009 Florida football clinic:

http://coachhoover.blogspot.com/search/label/Bill%20Belichick

Bill Belichick Notes:

 

•         – There is no “I” in Team, but there is an “I” in Win.

•         – Each individual must do his job for the team to win.

•         – Having Discipline = Do Your Job

•         – Football – all starts up the middle.  Is played from inside-out (Off, Def, ST).

And:

Defense

  •        Just because you have 11 guys wearing the same-colored jersey doesn’t mean you are a coordinated unit.

 

Pass Defense – must collision WRs so they don’t just run down field uncontested. 

  •         Get on WRs quickly – don’t give them any space.
  •        Don’t let them inside – keep good inside leverage.
  •        He showed his team cut-ups of Arizona’s WRs running downfield uncontested to reinforce what NOT to do.  Then show examples of what you do want to do.
  •        Pass Defense – DBs – job #1 – defend the deep ball.

 

Run Defense – set the edge – turn the ball back inside toward pursuit.

  •        Don’t just run upfield – must attack at correct angle. 
  •        Don’t let the ball outside for uncontested yardage.
  •        Force player – once you force it inside, shed block and get in on tackle.  You want to push back the  LOS.
  •        Must teach players how to defeat blocks.
  •        QB as runner – Offense will always out-gap you.  Somebody must be a two-gap player.
  •        Backside of Defense – still want to set the edge for Reverse, Cutback, and Misdirection.
  •       Every week – emphasis is on setting the edge.
  •      Tackling – don’t leave your feet – run thru the RB.

Pass Rush – worst place to be is behind the QB.

  •      Must collapse the pocket to get at depth of QB.
  •       Must have push up the middle – don’t let QB step up in pocket.
  •       Michael Vick – obviously would play differently.
  •       Pass Rusher behind QB – worst position in football that you can be in.
  •       Pass rush helps the coverage more than having four Champ Baileys will do.

No comments about why the Pats use the defensive alignment they use or why a 3-4 is better than a 4-3.  Instead here are our objectives to being a successful defense.

Nick Saban is considered one of the best defensive minds in college football and was Belichick’s defensive co-ordinator at Cleveland from 1991 to 1994.  Notice the similarity between Belichick’s objectives on defense and Saban’s defensive philsophy from an article written on SmartFoobtall.com:

“[Our] philosophy on first and second down is to stop the run and play good zone pass defense. We will occasionally play man-to-man and blitz in this situation. On third down, we will primarily play man-to-man and mix-in some zone and blitzes. We will rush four or more players versus the pass about ninety-percent of the time.

“In all situations, we will defend the inside or middle of the field first – defend inside to outside. Against the run, we will not allow the ball to be run inside. We want to force the ball outside. Against the pass, we will not allow the ball to be thrown deep down the middle or inside. We want to force the ball to be thrown short and/or outside.

“… Finally, our job is to take the ball away from the opponents’ offense and score or set up good field position for our offense. We must knock the ball loose, force mistakes, and cause turnovers.Turnovers and making big plays win games. We will be alert and aggressive and take advantage of every opportunity to come up with the ball … . The trademark of our defense will be effort, toughness, and no mental mistakes regarding score or situation in any game.”

So where am I going with all of this?  We read and hear time and time again people talk about schemes and alignments, but from what you can read that is less important to the actual people whose jobs depend upon it than meeting the objectives they have for their defenses.

As pointed out some coaches will do this by using a set scheme and then attacking the defense with a variety of stunts, blitzes, and coverages.  There are some coaches though that varies the alignment to best fit personnel.  As pointed out earlier this is done in the NFL to leverage flexibility out of the roster.  The Pats have been one of the best recently on both sides of the ball. Roster limits have made it very attractive to have players who can effectively line-up at more than one position.  Some college offenses have effectively done this to take advantage of the fact there is not a rule similar to the NFL requirement to allow the defense to substitute personnel between snaps.

Consider the OU offense a few years back when they could possibly go a traditional I-formation, one back with two tights, one back in a spread formation, and five-wides without every substituting one player. Their offense was at a huge advantage by using to the line, letting the coaches see the defensive personnel, signaling in the call, and then shifting to the appropriate formation. 

Defenses were forced to play OU straight up which allowed the Sam Bradford to exploit the biggest mismatch or the defensive co-ordinator guess that their defensive call was the right one and not result in a big play for the Sooner offense. Since most defenses were not as talented as the Sooner offense they were forced to basically guess and hope.

Newton’s Third Law of Motion is that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction and we see that happen in football.  Offenses and defenses will counter each others changes in style and scheme in a never ending cycle.  The important thing to remember is that while intellectual discussion is fine and good, but as a good friend used to say “the last man with the chalk at the board always wins”.  In the end the only thing that truly matters is what you can and can’t do on the field and if we look to Newton’s three laws again I think the law of inertia gives us the key for modern defenses:

An object at rest will remain at rest unless acted on by an unbalanced force. An object in motion continues in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.

 Basically I need to kick your ass to stop you be it by brute force, scheming, or a combination of both.  There have been a few defenses in the past the just lined up and wore the opposing offense out.  We saw it in the great Texas defenses in the early 80’s for example and then again at the U during there incredible run, but to do it means to have an incredible load of talent.  Both those Texas teams and the U had rosters full of future NFL defensive players.  LSU this last season was a defense crafted in that image and might have been the most talented group in the country. 

The most effective in my mind thought was Alabama for the simple reason the effectively combined great physical talent with a scheme that put the talent in the best possible situation based upon what the defense wanted to do for each given down and distance and not merely aligned itself in response to the offense.  It isn’t an accident that Nick Saban’s defense reflects the philosophy seen in so many NFL defenses with his NFL roots and experience. 

Found below are listed four web addresses to some great pieces I found on Saban and the Alabama defense. The first is from SmartFootball and begins with a great article from Grantland Blog, second is a well done work from AI.com on Alabama’s situational defense, third is Gus Malzahn talking about how you can try to attack Alabama’s defense, and finally why Saban prefers the 3-4 defense.

http://smartfootball.com/tag/saban

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2011/09/situational_defense_decoded_an.html

http://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/gus-malzahn-discusses-how-attack-nick-sabans-defense-smart-football

http://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/2011/nick-saban-3-4-defense/

I am sure some will point to Saban expressing a preference about scheme, but remember what I had written above and something I have heard time and time again from friend who are coaches. Pick your objectives, decide tactically how you will achieve those objectives, and then decide what scheme will best help you carry out those tactics.

There are a multitude of articles written about the defense Manny Diaz has brought to Austin and listed below are a few I found informative:

http://coachhoover.blogspot.com/2011/07/manny-diaz-fire-zones.html

http://brophyfootball.blogspot.com/2011/01/manny-diaz-bulletproof-fire-zone.html

http://smartfootball.com/tag/defense

One thing you will notice is that Diaz is more concerned with the the result of the defense then how the defense is aligned to achieve the result.  Notice this quote from the Brophy Football Blog:

 

I always think that schemes are overrated….We’re going to attack out of a multiple array of fronts. If I had my druthers, I’d like to play a 5-4-5, which you’re not allowed to do. But I want the offense to feel…like we’ve got about 13-14 guys running around. We want to look like we have an unfair advantage.”

This brings me back to Jerry Tarkanian’s Amoeba defense and how it relates to Texas football. Remember the ultimate goals of the defense and how they were the result of a defense evolving to meet those goals.  The same can be seen in the evolution of defense and the changing offense in college football today.  Diaz has lined out on one of the sites listed above a group of defensive objectives that look very similar to those you can find expressed by LeBeau, Capers, Belichick, and Saban.  Control the middle, contain on the edge, get after the passer, and force the worst athlete on the field to make plays against better, faster athletes.  Manny is a bit more aggressive than the four I named and I think a big reason is he hasn’t had to face an experienced quarterback behind a cohesive offensive line that will absolutely destroy a defense if they tip off to quickly their intent. Yes, it might lead to a play like the long run against Oklahoma State when the center of the field is left open, but in college you just aren’t going to find quarterbacks who have  spent their last ten years of free time watching film like Peyton Manning or an offensive line anchored by a couple of tackles who can spot line stunts and blitzes by the defenders foot and hand positions.

Manny himself has said he isn’t worried about scheme, isn’t worried about is he using and odd front or even front, if players are shading one way, or whatever the buzz words might be thrown around the various websites and bars.  All he cares about is causing confusion, bringing players from angles the offense is prepared to face, and do it with speed and violence.

Now, up to this point I have been able to point to an article or a quote as a basis for the things I have attributed to the various defensive coaches, but from this point I can’t do any more than say I just have a feeling we are seeing a fundamental change in the Texas defense over the next few years.  Diaz is not building to stock players that fit in a specific scheme or front, but are damn good football players that can run.  There will be some key positions that will have specific skills such as cornerback where they will have to be able to play man and he will have some big bodies inside to control the inside running game, but after that the focus will be on players and not positions. 

If you look at the two defensive classes that Manny has been involved with you will find a number of players who look to have the potential to slide between two linked positions. For example, Malcolm Brown projects to being a great defensive tackle in a traditional even front, but also is quick and agile enough to slide out and play over most college offensive tackles on occasion and give them fits.  Davis, Cottrell, and Hall are look to have the ability to play from a traditional three point stance at defensive end or standing up as an outside linebacker.  Edmond, Thompson, and Santos all look to be able to provide a bigger, more physical presence against the running game early in the downs and then have the ability to flip outside as an edge rusher. Jinkens looks to be an outside linebacker who could walk out on a slot and Colbert and Huhn definitely look like safety prospects who could slide down and give the look of an extra linebacker.

Not every defensive prospect is going to have these abilities and I am not sure it is Manny’s first priority when recruiting a player, but I do believe he doesn’t first see a defensive tackle or a linebacker or a safety.  Instead he sees a group of defensive players that give him the flexibility to change the formation of the defense, change the attacking angles, change the reads on the blocking assignments without changing personnel and without giving up the ability to defense a variety of offenses which is important when you think in terms of being competitive nationally. 

Consider the possibilities of putting on the feed a defensive group of Moore, Brown, Jeffcoat, Davis, Hicks, Edmonds, Jinkens, Diggs, Turner, Evans, and Colbert. Just for discussions sake you can see a traditional 4-3-4 alignment, move Davis off the line and you now have a 3-4-3 look, move Colbert up and you have a 4-4-3, or move Davis and Jinkens “back” and you get a 3-3-5.  The changes don’t have to be that drastic, just a few steps in one direction, and might involved playing upright instead of down, but now imagine you are a young offensive line and you are trying to call out blocking assignments. The defensive tackle over you has now slid over to the tackle and now you are looking head up at say Edmonds so we can a college guard trying to block a mobile and big linebacker (Manny’s rule of making the worst athletes on the field make difficult plays.). My thoughts go back to Manny’s point about looking like there are 14 or 15 defensive players on the field. 

 Maybe I am way off base with this theory and that is why I put it here on this blog. If you think it is rubbish so be it.  I just wanted to throw a thought out there that had occurred to me while watching the players Texas was recruiting on defense and reading up a bit on Manny’s thoughts on defense.